FRANKFORT – The Kentucky Senate passed a measure today that could result in the
rewriting of public school lesson plans and tests in favor of a locally-centric form
of educating.
After the approval of Senate Bill 1, dubbed the let the teacher teach act, Sen. Mike
Wilson, R-Bowling Green, hailed the moment as the day in which Kentucky set a
successful course for its public school curriculum.
“Our No. 1 resource is our children,” said Wilson, the primary sponsor of the bill.
“They will be the future leaders sitting here one day when we are gone.”
Wilson said the federal Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 paved the way for the
passage of SB 1 in Kentucky. The federal act stated that states do not have to
follow Common Core, a set of academic standards in mathematics, English language,
arts and literacy. Wilson said SB 1 would take advantage of this development by
empowering state education officials, locally-elected school board members and
teachers to decide the best teaching methods for their communities. In essence, it
could change what students are taught and how.
Wilson said SB 1 would “purge” language from a series of federal education
initiatives going back nearly two decades, including the No Child Left Behind Act
and Race to the Top, that has left state education law an unmanageable patchwork of
education theory du jour.
This doesn’t mean Kentucky is abandoning quality control, Wilson said. The more than
100-page-long SB 1 is an omnibus measure that would utilize Kentucky teachers to
create new standards that are rigorous and ensure students are prepared for the
industries operating in their communities. The bill sets up several committees and
advisory panels to review the standards.
SB 1 would also change how students are tested. Wilson said local educators would be
able to align what is taught with what is tested. He said it would allow teachers to
stop wasting valuable learning time ”teaching to the test,” a colloquial term for a
teaching style that is heavily focused on preparing students for a standardized
test.
Wilson said SB 1 further empowers teachers by replacing school self-evaluations
called Program Reviews that bog down educators with onerous paperwork. It would also
set up a new way for intervening in low-performing schools by placing more power in
the local school district during those interventions.
“It allows educators to do what they feel like that are called to do, and love to
do, which is teach our children,” he said. “Teachers invest in our future – and
nobody does it better.”
It was the second session in a row that an education reform bill was given the
designation as Senate Bill 1, a designation usually reserved for the Senate
president’s top legislative priority. While last year’s version passed out of the
Senate with a 25-12 vote before stalling in the state House of Representatives, this
year’s version passed with a 35-0 vote.
Senate Majority Floor Leader Damon Thayer, R-Georgetown, said the measure picked up
votes this year because of the collaborative approach of Wilson, who chairs the
Senate Education Committee. Wilson said he was aware he had talked extensively about
education reform to anyone who would listen – and some that probably didn’t want to
listen – for the last two years.
Passages of the measure were changed to alleviate last year’s concerns from
Kentucky’s arts community that high schoolers would be able to meet arts credit
requirements by taking classes such as computer programming. Also gone from the
measure is language that would have created “bands” of similar schools that would be
used for comparing academic growth.
The changes brought Senate Minority Whip Julian M. Carroll, D-Frankfort to rise in
support of SB 1.
“The reason you don’t see anyone standing to question this bill at this point is
because this bill has been explained in detail to each and every one of us
separately from this day and we have had our questions answered,” he said. “Because
of that, we are in strong support of this bill.”
Sen. Gerald N. Neal, D-Louisville, said Wilson’s bipartisan approach should be lauded.
“This is exactly how this body should function,” Neal said. “(Wilson’s) approach to
this was to include individuals in the process. But the most remarkable thing he did
was to listen, and he listened well.”